Unibet Netherlands is facing a €75 million collective compensation claim from Dutch consumer organisation Dynamiet, which is representing around 2,500 players. The lawsuit targets Kindred Group, Unibet’s parent company, and its former subsidiary Risepoint, accusing them of facilitating illegal online gambling before the Netherlands’ Remote Gambling Act (KOA) came into force on 1 October 2021.
Dynamiet Takes Aim at Unlicensed Operators
Dynamiet, known for winning a multimillion-euro case against the credit registry Bureau Krediet Registratie (BKR), is now turning its attention to the online gambling sector.
The group says this is the first large-scale restitution claim against a gambling operator seeking a Dutch licence, arguing that firms profiting from unlicensed activity should repay affected customers.
Co-founder Deepak Thakoerdien said the move is about more than financial recovery:
“For many of these people, it’s not just about money — it’s about recognition. They were ignored for years while being drained by an illegal casino. Waiting is for spectators; we are here to act.”
Targeting Unibet’s Dutch Operations
According to court filings, Dynamiet has already submitted claims for 1,000 players, with 1,500 more to follow, bringing total alleged losses to €75 million. The case will be heard by The Hague District Court.
Dutch outlet CasinoNieuws.nl reports that Unibet allegedly accepted Dutch players without a licence, while offering Dutch-language services, customer support, and payment via iDEAL — all signs it directly targeted the Dutch market.
Dynamiet argues that all gambling agreements between Unibet and Dutch customers should be considered “null and void”, with player losses deemed unlawfully obtained. The group also cited a 2019 fine from the Netherlands Gambling Authority (KSA), saying it proves Unibet “deliberately acted in violation of the Gambling Act.”
Regulatory Context: KOA’s Cooling-Off Period
Before the KOA regime launched, Dutch lawmakers decided against imposing retroactive taxes on offshore operators, but the KSA introduced a cooling-off period to limit the participation of those previously active without a licence.
This rule delayed Unibet’s return to the legal Dutch market until July 2022 — a full year after regulated online gambling began.
What It Means for Dutch Players
For everyday players, this case could become a test of accountability in the Netherlands’ online casino industry. If Dynamiet wins, affected users may finally see compensation for pre-licence gambling losses — and other operators that targeted Dutch players could face similar claims.
Wider Legal Push Against Foreign Brands
Dynamiet’s campaign isn’t stopping with Unibet. In early 2025, it announced plans to pursue six more major gambling brands — PokerStars, Betsson, N1 Casino, Bwin, LeoVegas, and 888 Casino — covering around 5,000 players and €100 million in losses.
The organisation runs on a no-cure-no-fee model, taking a 33% commission only if claims succeed.
A Landmark Case in the Making
Legal experts suggest this lawsuit could reshape how regulators and courts view retroactive responsibility in European gambling markets. A victory for Dynamiet may open the door to widespread compensation claims, forcing operators to reconsider the risks of unlicensed play in countries with newly regulated markets.
